State of Horror Address: The Bad Horror Movie

     It was Aristotle who stipulated that what makes something bad is failing at its function; and it was Jim Wynorski who retorted that what makes something bad is not having enough tits. But there's no such thing as 'enough tits,' so that definition is useless. And if the horror movie has any one function, I don't know what it is.

    What I do know is there are some filmmakers who, like a Russian bride after the wedding, just don't care. They make movies for the same reason God makes yeast infections: just because. They make movies like they make bowel-movements, imagining no audience at all.

    One such type of filmmaker is what I and his mother call 'the DeCoteau.' David DeCoteau's movies are made on miniscule budgets and guaranteed to turn profit by means of Netflix distribution deals. DeCoteau distributes these movies to put food on his table and cocks in his mouth. If he ever makes a good film, as he sometimes does, it is thanks to the screenwriter and Kamapuaa, the mighty Pig God of Hawaii. It's certainly not because he has any desire to keep you entertained.

    Another type is the middle class white kid who's gotten so bored of World of Warcraft and not having sex, that he gets a few buddies together in mom's backyard to shoot a movie. Rather than concluding the result of his hobby, much like his Star Trek quilts and Naruto fanfics, is best hidden beneath his Final Fantasy 'doujinshi' porn comics, he decides to try distrubute it as a real film. This is possible thanks to indiscriminate distributors like Brain Damage Films, which carries the full oeuvre of virgins like Todd Sheets. Unless you're the 'director's' grandmother, these films offer you nothing. Like a smooth, prehensile turd, they're fun to make, but no fun to watch.

    Some filmmakers really do care, however. But like true cowboys, they can't let you know they care. Quite the opposite, they go out of their way to make you think they don't care. They give their movies ostentatiously bad titles that impishly dare you to hope they'll be good, titles like, "Big Tit Schoolgirls in the Playground of the Dead," or "RoboPimp Flamethrower vs. the Bible Belt Hookers." Sometimes these titles, like Hollywood Chainsaw Hookers, Hobo with a Shotgun, and Schindler's List are a cue that you'll be getting cheaply-made, tongue-in-cheek entertainment. But often, the titles are the best part of the movie, as in the case of Bikini Girls on Ice. And this way, when their movie does suck, they can play dumb, DeCoteau, or dead, and say they weren't even trying.

    Finally, there are the filmmakers who, unlike Rhett Butler, give a damn and an unnecessary urine sample. And often these filmmakers, like a clumsy but earnest lover, will hit the right spots and transport you to horror movie heaven. We're not interested in them now. We're interested in the earnest lovers who get us wet and sticky in the wrong places, and makes us laugh when we should be moaning; the heroes whose indelicate probing has caused me to beat the hell out of this metaphor. In this category we have our fertilizer salesmen like Hal P. Warren, who saw The Wizard of Oz and said, "I could do this with a broken wind-up Bolex and my knobby-kneed drinking buddy." And transvestites like Ed Wood who wrote the most epic sci-fi horror since Little Women and tried to make it with ten bucks and a 98% dead Bela Lugosi.

    Yes, this is the category of filmmaker who is full of ideas and passion, so much passion it has to beat the crap out of know-how, talent, and common sense to make extra room. These are ideas so grand that they can only be realized with ineptitude. But from the cousins of ineptitude and pennilessness come the inbred children of strangeness and uniqueness. Plan 9 from Outer Space, Troll 2, Manos: The Hands of Fate, The Chooper, Blood Orgy of the She-Devils, and, of course, Intercessor: Another Rock 'n' Roll Nightmare are bad movies, but brilliantly entertaining in their earnest zeal to excite, shock, and terrify with stuff that isn't remotely exciting, shocking, or terrifying.

    At the end of the day, the beginning, even sometimes during the middle of the day while eating a sandwich, horror fans are an accepting crowd. Yes, we ask to be entertained, sometimes shocked, frightened, horrified, maybe even intellecually engaged--but really, the bare minimum we ask is some passion. When the filmmakers don't even care--and we know, not through our ubiquitous bathroom cameras, but through intuition--that's what makes a bad horror film. We just want to know you love us. You don't have to say it; we just have to feel it.

In memory of Ray Dennis Steckler

State of Horror Address: Teagan Clive

    Some things just inspire poetry. The acts of great men have inspired Homer in The Iliad, and Walt Davis in Sex Psycho; the beauty of nature inspired Wordsworth's "Rain Cloud" and Max Hardcore's "Peeing in a College Girl." Teagan Clive is one such entity. I have had the opportunity to see her twice and feel she's strong in the Force once. Both times I've seen her has been in b-movies, and each time she had even less clothing than they had plot. One is Interzone (1987) by Deran Sarafian, the other is Alienator (1990) by Fred Olen Ray.

    Teagan, if you've yet to encounter her in her brief cinematic oeuvre, is a modern, powerful woman. I don't mean powerful like Hilary Clinton, but more like the sasquatches of the WNBA. She has an immaculately-sculpted, muscular body that nears the boundary between "sexy aerobics instructor" and "where's the penis?" but keeps on the good side. Unlike many female body builders, her face does not resemble Jackie Chan's left foot or a frozen mop, but rather retains its voluptuous femininity. Her beauty is a strange but striking combination of the Grecian and the Californian ideals, except heterosexual.

    Armenian director Deran Sarafian knew that for his epic second feature, Interzone, a post-apocalyptic action adventure, he required the inspiration of a Homer and the visual splendor of the Sistene Chapel--but for only $2000. Thus was Teagan cast as Mantis, the sociopathic warlord who is constantly posing for an unseen Sports Illustrated shoot. Opposite Teagan is Bruce Abbot, a smug cross-breed of Bill Pullman and Elias Kotias. He plays Swan, a wheelin' dealin' douchebag who gets by on wisecracks and streetsmarts, like a white Morgan Freeman. But this descendant of Indiana Jones and Pinocchio is drawn, as all heroes must be, by love and prophecy into saving the treasures of the Interzone from Mantis.

    Interzone is an immensely fun movie that will do for your brain what a bubblebath does for your anus. But the highlight of the movie, and not coincidentally, the most Teagan-filled sequence, is--like the cleansing effervescence of my Ninja Turtles bubblebath--when Swan decides he must seduce Mantis to defeat her. As in real life, this triggers a five-minute montage of Teagan posing in silhouette while a band of harpists play an endlessly looping tune of about five notes. Once the posing is done, Teagan graduates, as any warm-blooded woman with Bruce Abbot would do, to blindfolding him then hand-feeding him bananas and sardines.

    What I'm saying is not just that Teagan happened to partake in this playful, creative, charming scene like a fat kid in gym class. I'm saying that that scene could no more be conceived without Teagan than the Gospels could without the Jesus, or the Mona Lisa without the prostitutes. The scene is composed from Teagan's unique features: her exquisitely-honed female form with its intimations of power even greater than William Shatner's testicles; her seductive femininity with its subtle vulnerability, not unlike a kitten with a shotgun; and her playful expression of sexual desire. What makes Teagan so extraordinary is that, like a cheesecake, she makes contradicting features complementary.

    In Alienator, Fred Olen Ray, like an Asian parent, takes these features of Teagan's and pushes them farther. Much like Crime and Punishment, Alienator is about a space criminal who escapes to earth. The Alienator is not, as Marx argued, the capitalist wage system, but rather a cyborg entity sent to retrieve the space criminal. Combining nearly-invincible super-strength and cosmic destructive powers with a highly-toned female physique, the Alienator can only be played by Teagan--with due apologies to Ernest Borgnine's supporters.

    Just as in Interzone, there is one sequence of Alienator in particular that both encapsulates and is directly inspired by Teagan--a Teaguence, if you will. In Alienator, it's a single shot of Teagan, in her full space armor as any self-respecting Alienator must be, reclining against a tree. She holds out her hand to a deer, perhaps grieving a dead mother--we just don't know--and it comes to her without fear or even lust. The shot combines the physical power of Teagan's physique with the opposing tenderness in her femininity; the Alienator's destructive potential with her gentleness toward the innocent and harmony with nature. In doing so, it almost spiritualizes these features, not unlike Patrick Swayze in Ghost; and it achieves a photogenic sublimity--photogeneity being, according to Delluc and Epstein, the very essence of cinema.

    Perhaps you will think I'm going too far. But there is no denying the real importance of the photogenic in cinema. And Teagan's body and elegant movements are powerfully photogenic, leading to unforgettable moments of fun and charm in what could have been forgettable movies. I don't know where Tegan is now. She, like Sylvester Stallone and Matthew Broderick, has not acted since 1990. But she was a b-movie Muse while she was active, and her few contributions deserve this long overdue recognition.

P.S. Come back, Teagan!